Legal Opinion
Bank of Commerce & Trust Co. v. Commissioners of Tallahatchie Drainage Dist. No. 1
Mississippi Supreme Court
Decided May 5, 1930No. 28474PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, J.
After the affirmance by the Supreme Court of the judgment of the circuit court of Tallahatchie county in favor of the Yocona-Tallahatchie drainage district, against the Tallahatchie drainage district (148 Miss. 182, 114 So. 264), the Yocona district transferred and assigned the judgment to appellant, the Bank of Commerce & Trust Company. The drainage improvements in the Tallahatchie district had been abandoned before there was any assessment of benefits, and the judgment represented preliminary expenses incurred prior thereto. Appellants, the Bank of Commerce & Trust Company and the Yocona…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Houck v. Little River Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Ashton v. . City of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Van Etten v. . NewtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Stone v. WinnCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
- Jones v. Belzoni Drainage DistrictMississippi Supreme Court · 1912
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Moore v. MolpusMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
- Bank of Commerce & Trust Co. v. Commissioners Tallahatchie Drainage District No. 1Mississippi Supreme Court · 1931
- Bank of Commerce & Trust Co. v. Union Central Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
- Sica v. City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1982