Legal Opinion

Jane Huggins v. Prince George's County, MD

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided June 27, 2012No. 10-2366PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge:

Jane Huggins, trading as SADISCO of Maryland (SADISCO) brought the present civil action against Prince George’s County, Maryland (the County) and five County officials (the Officials) after the County shut down the salvage automobile wholesaling business operated by SADISCO on a parcel of land that SADISCO owned within the County. SADISCO’s complaint alleged one count under federal law and four counts under Maryland’s common law. The district court dismissed certain counts pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and granted summary judgment…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. COLOMIRIS v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  5. Brockington v. BoykinsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Snider International Corporation v. Town of Forest Heights, MDCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
  2. Proctor v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, D. Maryland · 2018
  3. Siena Corporation v. Mayor and City Council of RockCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
  4. Doe v. Rector & Visitors of George Mason UniversityDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015
  5. Murphy-Taylor v. HofmannDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API