Legal Opinion

Flaherty v. Whitin

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 18, 1924PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBraley, J.

The petition, which is in conformity with G. L. c. 201, § 16, alleges, that the respondent by reason of advanced age and mental weakness has become incapacitated *179to properly care for his property, “ Wherefore your petitioner, a friend of said Arthur F. WTiitin, prays, that some suitable person be appointed conservator of the property of said Arthur F. Whitin agreeable to the law in such case made and provided, and that the statements herein contained are true to the best of his knowledge and belief.” It was signed, verified, and filed by the petitioner, and, a citation having issued, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hale v. BlanchardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  2. Burns v. HoveyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  3. O'Neill v. O'NeillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Comstock v. BowlesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  2. Dunn v. McSweeneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API