Legal Opinion

Strickland v. . Bingham

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 19, 1947PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

The plaintiff’s theory of the case may be understood from his demands for relief; (a) that defendants be adjudged to hold the legal title to the land in trust for the plaintiff and account to him for rentals arising from their unlawful occupancy; (b) that defendants be required to convey the lands in controversy to plaintiff in the specific performance of the contract between the plaintiff and the male defendant Bingham, or, in lieu thereof, pay plaintiff the sum of $5,000 purchase price for the land as damages; (c) that plaintiff recover of the defendant Bingham damages alleged to be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lefkowitz v. . SilverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  2. Seergy v. Morris Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1924
  3. Payne v. JenningsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Darden v. HoutzDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1964
  2. Forbis v. HoneycuttCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API