Legal Opinion

Kirsch v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 28, 1970No. 110, September Term, 1970PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, C. J.

Appellant claims that his constitutional right to be secure from an unreasonable search and seizure was violated when a police officer, without a search warrant, invaded his privacy while he was in a locked men’s room in a gas station and secured evidence of his guilty control of heroin and narcotic paraphernalia. 1

The evidence at trial showed that on December 7, 1968 at 9:30 p.m., Officer Ronald Arnold went to the gas station in response to a call for assistance from the station attendant. Upon arrival, he met the attendant who told him “there were three males in the restroom, and they had…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Stoner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Mancusi v. DeForteSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Brooks v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  2. United States v. SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. People v. AbateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. People v. HuntMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Ward v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API