Legal Opinion

Meyer Bros. v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 15, 1884PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Bill in Equity for Specific Performance of Gontractfor Purchase of Land. Appeal from tlie Chancery Court of Dallas. Heard before the Hon. N. S. Graham.

1Opinion of the CourtOlopton, J.

At a sale of the real estate of Alanson Salt-marsh, made by his administrator in December, 1877, the complainant purchased a tract of land, consisting of about eight hundred and forty acres. A few days afterwards, by agreement, the complainant transferred to Rainey and Lovett his bid and purchase, on their assuming his obligation for the pur*313chase-money ; and they, in consideration, agreed in writing to give complainant “ sixty acres of laud, viz., fifty Comida and cane-bottom, also ten acres hill-side woodland joining the Mitchell tract.” The particular sixty acres given to complainant was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Meyer Bros. v. MitchellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Angel v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
  2. Bogan v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  3. Howison v. BartlettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
  4. Hall v. PegramSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  5. Ezzell v. S. G. Holland Stave Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API