Legal Opinion

Curtis White Const. v. Butts & Billingsley

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 21, 1985No. 84-61PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This dispute arose out of a paving contract which the plaintiff contends the defendant breached. The trial court, having heard the evidence, found for the defendant. Plaintiff appeals. We affirm the order of the trial court, which is as follows:

"FINAL JUDGMENT
"This cause was heretofore heard by the Court, submitted by the parties, and taken under advisement. The Court having considered and reconsidered the evidence in the case finds as follows:
"The plaintiff and the defendant entered into a contract whereby the defendant was to perform certain paving work for the plaintiff for the sum of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. First Alabama Bank of Montgomery, N. A. v. CokerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  2. Commercial Contractors, Inc. v. Sumar Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  3. Pollard v. Guaranty Pest Control, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1977

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Ex Parte PerkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  2. T.V. v. B.S.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  3. Gray v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  4. Norandal U.S.A., Inc. v. GrabenCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2009
  5. Atkins v. StateCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2009

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API