Exeter v. Kenick
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtBlandin, J.
The main issue before us is whether procedural rules which were passed at annual town meetings to regulate the method of voting on certain appropriations at subsequent town meetings are binding on such meetings.
At the annual town meeting in Exeter on March 12, 1935, an affirmative vote was cast on the following article: “To see if the town will vote to have all articles other than those legally, or otherwise, regular and necessary placed on an Australian ballot, if they involve, or are likely to involve, the sum of seven hundred fifty dollars or more. This to be done with such articles for…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Tayloe v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Ellis v. StokesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
3Cited by8 opinions
- Piper v. MeredithSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
- Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
- Calawa v. Town of LitchfieldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972
- Hooksett Drive-In Theatre, Inc. v. HooksettSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
- Town of Jackson v. Town and Country Motor Inn, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.