Legal Opinion
Auto Driveaway Co. v. Auto Logistics of Columbus
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided June 9, 1999No. C2-98-285PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
MARBLEY, Judge.
This cause comes before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss or Stay Proceedings for Plaintiffs Failure to Comply with Ohio Rev.Code § 1703.03. For the following reasons, this Motion is GRANTED. This action is STAYED until Plaintiff conforms to the dictates § 1703.03.
I
Plaintiff Auto Driveaway Co. (“Plaintiff’) is a vehicle delivery service operating through company offices as well as offices of independent Auto Driveaway agents in the United States and Canada. Under the Auto Driveaway system, individual and commercial customers seeking to move cars, trucks…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dot Systems, Inc. v. Adams Robinson Ent., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1990
- Cocon, Inc. v. Botnick Building Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1989
- Contel Credit Corp. v. Tiger, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1987
- Manhattan Terrazzo Brass Strip Co. v. A. Benzing & SonsOhio Court of Appeals · 1943
3Cited by5 opinions
- State ex rel. Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine v. Board of TrusteesOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Bosl v. First Fin. Invest. Fund IOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Drown v. ESB (In Re Farley)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2008
- Promac Technologies, L.L.C. v. Fabrication Automation, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021
- Stepp v. Proficient Transport, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017