Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Jordan Mach. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 13, 1911No. 67PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of New York. Suit in equity by William B. Palmer and Jesse V. Palmer against the Jordan Machine Company for infringement of letters patent No. 878,995, for apparatus for inverting tubular fabrics, issued to William B. Palmer February 11, 1908. Decree for defendant (186 Fed. 496), and complainants appeal. Reversed.

1Opinion of the Court

COXE, Circuit Judge.

The judge of the Circuit Court has carefully described the objects sought to be attained by the Palmer patent in suit and the means for attaining them. It will serve no useful purpose to reiterate what he has said in this regard. Should anyone, besides the parties to this litigation, be interested in its previous history, he will find all the issues fully set out and discussed in the opinion below. The controversy, which involved eight claims in the Circuit Court, is now reduced to three — the first, seventh and eighth. We do not deem it necessary to consider at length the…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mergenthaler Linotype Co. v. International Typesetting Mach. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1914
  2. Palmer v. John K. Stewart & Sons, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 1920
  3. Palmer v. E. Z. Waist Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1922
  4. Palmer v. Superior Mfg. Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1913
  5. Palmer v. E. Z. Waist Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API