Boykai v. Young
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
BENDER, P.J.:
Ted Young (“Appellant” or “Husband”) appeals from the protection from abuse (PFA) order entered on March 20, 2013, which provided for the protection of Geraldine Boykai (“Appellee” or “Wife”) for a period of one year. On appeal, Husband asserts that the trial court erred as a matter of law in concluding that the evidence established “abuse” under the Protection From Abuse Act, 23 Pa.C.S. § 6101, et seq. We affirm.
The trial court provided the following procedural and factual history:
Both parties are originally from Liberia, Africa.' Wife ... came to the United States in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. DowlingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Commonwealth v. EckroteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Stamus v. DutcavichSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
3Cited by15 opinions
- K.B. v. Tinsley, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- T.K. v. A.Z.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- A.A. v. A.Q.P., IIISuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- A.N.B v. D.M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- A.R.Z. v. C.M.B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.