Legal Opinion

Housing Authority v. Angel

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 29, 1965No. 5-3526PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sam Robinson, Associate Justice.

Appellant, The Housing Authority of the City of Searcy, filed this action to acquire by eminent' domain a portion of two lots in Searcy; one belonging to appellees O. H. and Fay Angel, the other to appellees M. H. Phelps and wife. A jury allowed the property owners $2,500 as damages to the remaining portion of each lot. The Housing Authority has appealed contending that the owners were not qualified to express an opinion as to value, and that there is no substantial evidence to support the verdicts.

Both Mr. Angel and Mr. Phelps testified that the difference in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ark. State Highway Comm. v. CarderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
  2. Ark. State Highway Comm. v. Muswick Cigar & Beverage Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1959
  3. Jonesboro, Lake City & Eastern Railroad v. AshabrannerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Springdale v. WeathersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
  2. Arkansas State Highway Commission v. ClarkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  3. Arkansas-Missouri Power Co. v. SainSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  4. Arkansas State Highway Comm'n v. HighfillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  5. City of Springdale v. WeathersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API