Legal Opinion

Smith v. City of East Point

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 18, 1988No. 73757PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McMurray, Presiding Judge.

In City of East Point v. Smith, 258 Ga. 111 (365 SE2d 432), the Supreme Court held that the city’s urinalysis testing in this case was reasonable under our State constitution. In so holding, the Supreme Court reversed our decision in Smith v. City of East Point, 183 Ga. App. 659 (359 SE2d 692). We had held that Smith’s constitutional rights were violated by an unreasonable search and seizure of his urine and that, therefore, Smith was discharged by the city without just cause. Id at 662. In view of the Supreme Court’s reversal of our decision, we must now examine the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Welch v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
  2. Scott v. UndercoflerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  3. City of East Point v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1988
  4. Schaffer v. State Board of Veterinary MedicineCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  5. Raines v. WhiteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Goodwin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  2. Schlanger v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  3. Bearden v. City of AustellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  4. Pinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  5. Ramey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API