Legal Opinion

State v. Greene

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 19, 1992No. 218A91PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Justice.

The defendant’s first assignment of error deals with his trial counsel’s final argument to the jury. The defendant contends that his trial counsel, without the defendant’s consent or authorization, argued that the jury should find the defendant guilty of involuntary manslaughter, thus depriving the defendant of his constitutional right to the effective assistance of counsel. Trial counsel argued, in part, as follows:

Karl Greene didn’t have anything to do with me being here. Don’t use what I’ve said and done against him. Wouldn’t be right. I’ve done my best. I’ve plowed the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. State v. BraswellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. State v. BuchananSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
  2. State v. BardenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  3. People v. MathenySupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  4. State v. GaineySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  5. State v. KemmerlinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API