Legal Opinion

In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of Reimers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 9, 1932No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarswell, J.

We find no reason for disturbing the decree in so far as it relates to the probate of the November 23, 1928, will of the decedent.

The decree awarded the contestants (executors under a prior will) “ costs ” and allowed them $854.40 “ disbursements ” and a counsel fee of $2,500 as “ expenses.”

We think, however, that the decree is erroneous in so far as it allowed “ disbursements ” and “ expenses.”

The power of the surrogate to award costs and grant allowances is purely statutory. (Matter of Eddy, 207 App. Div. 162, 163.)

The pertinent portion of section 278 of the Surrogate’s Court Act, giving…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Proving the Will of StaigerNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of LydonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
  3. In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of DevineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re the Probate of the Will of ReimersNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  2. Blum v. LevyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API