Legal Opinion
National Casualty Co. v. Vigilant Insurance
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 21, 2006No. 06 Civ. 784(RJH)PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HOLWELL, District Judge.
Defendant Vigilant Insurance Company (“Vigilant”) brings this motion under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to dismiss the amended complaint filed by plaintiff National Casualty Company (“National”) in its entirety. In its amended complaint, National alleges five separate causes of action: contribution, subrogation, breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and breach of agreement. For the reasons stated below, this Court grants Vigilant’s motion in part and denies it in part.
BACKGROUND
This dispute relates to the relative…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v. Long Island Rail RoadNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Eternity Global Master Fund Limited v. Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York and Jpmorgan Chase BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Kramer v. Time Warner Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Olin Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Beazley Insurance v. Ace American InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Continental Casualty Co. v. National Union Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
- Peerless Ins. Co. v. Tech. Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2019
- ARCH SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA and THE CHARTER OAK FIRE INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2026
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.