Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rhone v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided January 30, 2004No. CR-02-0493Published

1Dissent

I agree with Parts I and IV of the majority's opinion; the circuit court correctly denied the claims in Rhone's Rule, 32, Ala.R.Crim.P., petition for post-conviction relief. However, I disagree with Parts II and III of the opinion. I would grant the State's request and remand this case for the circuit court to accept Rhone's amendment to his Rule 32 petition and to rule on the claims in that amendment.

As the majority recognizes, Rule 32.7(b), Ala.R.Crim.P., provides that "[a]mendments to pleadings may be permitted at any stage of the proceedings prior to the entry of judgment." However, Rule…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Stead v. Blue Cross-Blue Shield of AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  3. Poston v. GaddisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  4. Walker v. TraughberCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1977
  5. Ex Parte AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API