Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Robidoux

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 4, 2007PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCordy, J.

Following a purported revelation from God in early March, 1999, the defendant, Jacques Robidoux, and his wife, Karen, restricted their ten month old son’s diet to breast milk and water, and deprived him of solid food. Samuel Robidoux died in late April, 1999, within days of his first birthday, from malnutrition caused by starvation. On June 14, 2002, after a nine-day trial, a jury found Robidoux guilty of murder in the first degree by reason of extreme atrocity or cruelty.

On appeal from his conviction and from the denial of his motions for a new trial, Robidoux claims that (1) he was denied…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. United States v. BallardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Commonwealth v. WrightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  5. Commonwealth v. SatterfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. OberleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2017
  2. Commonwealth v. RousseauMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
  3. Commonwealth v. EarleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
  4. Commonwealth v. WomackMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
  5. Commonwealth v. SantosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API