Butler v. Steck
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1DissentKing, J.
I do not disagree with the basic statements of the applicable fundamental principles of law as given in the majority opinion. My disagreement is with their application to this case. I think the verdict of the jury, which in effect allowed but $5000 for post-mortem damages, while low, was reasonable on a permissible view of the evidence. The court’s memorandum of decision *120granting the motion to set aside the verdict does not suggest that anything occurred during the trial which was calculated to arouse passion, prejudice or bias in the jury, nor that the charge was incorrect. See cases such as…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Floyd v. Fruit Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
- Ardoline v. KeeganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Chase v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- Sims v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Nelson v. Branford Lighting & Water Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1903
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.