Legal Opinion

Gregory H. Andrews v. Beverly Plouff

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided May 29, 2013No. 2011-348-AppealPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice ROBINSON,

for the Court.

A Superior Court jury found that the plaintiffs, Gregory H. and Christina G. Andrews, were entitled to the return of their deposit after a residential real estate transaction came to naught. On appeal, we must decide whether the trial court properly included prejudgment interest in the judgment for plaintiffs.

This case is before the Court pursuant to an order directing the parties to show cause why the issues raised in this appeal should not be summarily decided. After carefully considering the record, the mem-oranda submitted to this Court on behalf of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Waterman v. CaprioSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2009
  2. Ryan v. City of ProvidenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2011
  3. Bogosian v. BedermanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003
  4. Rhode Island Insurers' Insolvency Fund v. Leviton Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
  5. In Re Estate of CantoreSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sophie F. Danforth v. Timothy T. More, NosSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2016
  2. The Free & Clear Company v. The Narragansett Bay CommissionSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2016
  3. Continental Casualty Company v. CaramadreDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API