Legal Opinion
In Re Freshwater Wetlands Protection Act Rules
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided July 20, 2004PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Poritz
This case raises questions in respect of the validity of General Permit 23 (GP23), N.J.A.C. 7:7A-5.23, adopted by the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) in 1999.1 Appellants2 claim that GP23, which permits the limited expansion of existing cranberry growing operations in the Pinelands National Reserve, violates provisions of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972, commonly known as the Clean Water Act (CWA), 33 U.S.C.A. § 1344, the Freshwater Wetlands Protection Act (FWPA), N.J.S.A. 13:9B-1 to -30, and the State’s Surface Water Quality Standards…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Environmental Protection Agency v. California Ex Rel. State Water Resources Control BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Arkansas v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Metromedia, Inc. v. Director, Division of TaxationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- New Jersey Guild of Hearing Aid Dispensers v. LongSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Estate of DeMartino v. DIV. OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE AND HEALTH SERVICESNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
- Casey Piatt v. Police and Firemen's RetirementNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2015
- New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection v. HuberSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
- Hopewell Valley Citizens' Group, Inc. v. Berwind Property Group Development Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
- Campo Jersey, Inc. v. Director, Division of TaxationNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.