Legal Opinion

Young v. Young

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 9, 1955PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Decree affirmed. This is a libel for divorce alleging cruel and abusive treatment on the part of the libellee, and that he, being of sufficient ability, grossly, wantonly, and cruelly refused and neglected to provide suitable maintenance for the libellant. The judge decreed that the prayer for divorce be denied, that the case be continued on the docket from time to time, and that during such continuance the libellee pay to the libellant the sum of $30 each week for her support. The libellant appealed. The evidence is reported. The judge made no findings of fact, but his decree imports a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Berry v. KyesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  2. Attorney General v. City of WoburnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  3. Peabody v. PeabodyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  4. Keenan v. KeenanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  5. Holt v. HoltMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Joseph Freedman Co. v. North Penn Transfer, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  2. Burnham v. BurnhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
  3. Cannistraro v. CannistraroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
  4. Cannistraro v. CannistraroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
  5. Springfield Industries v. Broes Trucking Co.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API