Legal Opinion
(HC) Bisel v. Fisher
District Court, E.D. California
Decided December 23, 2019No. 1:17-cv-00013Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GREGORY EUGENE BISEL, No. 1:17-cv-00013-DAD-SKO (HC) 12 Petitioner, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO DENY MOTION FOR DEFAULT 13 v. [Doc. 41] 14 RAY FISHER, JR., et al., 15 Respondents. 16 17 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus 18 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 19 On December 2, 2019, Petitioner filed a motion entitled, “Motion to Disqualify State for 20 Violating Court Order; Motion to Issue Writ of Habeas Corpus.” (Doc. 41.) Petitioner complains 21…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Willie Gordon v. Robert DuranCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Lockyer v. AndradeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Robert C. Bleitner v. George C. Welborn and Attorney General of the State of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.