Legal Opinion
People v. Bona
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided September 20, 2017No. 2d Crim. No. B277751PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPerren, J.
*514As a condition of his parole, Thomas D. Bona was committed to the State Department of Hospitals for treatment as a mentally disordered offender (MDO) ( Pen. Code,1 § 2962 ). The trial court ordered the commitment after it denied Bona's petition challenging the Board of Parole *515Hearings' (BPH) determination that he met the MDO criteria. (§ 2966, subd. (b), hereinafter § 2966(b).) Bona appeals, contending that (1) the court abused its discretion in continuing the hearing on his petition beyond the 60-day period set forth in section 2966(b); and (2) his trial attorney provided ineffective…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- People v. SanchezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- People v. RielCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- The People v. MaiCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- J.H. v. Superior Court of San Luis Obispo Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Cahill Construction Co., Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
- Conservatorship of C.O.California Court of Appeal · 2026
- Conservatorship of S.I. CA2/6California Court of Appeal · 2020
- People v. Darnell CA2/6California Court of Appeal · 2021
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.