Legal Opinion
Doe v. Selective Service System
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided March 10, 1983No. 3-82 Civ. 1670, 3-83 Civ. 100PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
ALSOP, District Judge.
This matter comes before the court upon the motions of plaintiffs in these cases for a preliminary injunction enjoining the defendants from enforcing Section 1113 of the Department of Defense Authorization Act of 1983, Pub.L. No. 97-252, 96 Stat. 748 (1982) (to be codified at Section 12(f) of the Selective Service Act, 50 U.S.C.App. § 462(f) (1982)) and any regulations promulgated thereunder. Defendants oppose the motions.
Plaintiffs John Doe, Richard Roe, Paul Poe, Bradley Boe, Carl Coe and Frank Foe are all male residents of Minnesota, 19 to 21 years…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Dataphase Systems, Inc. v. C L Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Selective Service System v. Minnesota Public Interest Research GroupSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Pempek v. EdgarDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984
- Minnesota Public Interest Research Group (MPIRG) v. Selective Service SystemCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- Selective Service System v. Minnesota Public Interest Research GroupSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Minnesota Public Interest Research Group (Mpirg) v. Selective Service SystemCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.