State of Arizona v. Agustin Gonzalez Gongora
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MILLER, Judge.
¶ 1 Agustín Gongora was convicted after a jury tidal of one count of voyeurism, after which the trial court suspended sentence and imposed a term of four years’ probation. On appeal, he contends there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction because the state failed to prove the victim had a reasonable expectation she would not be viewed. For the following reasons, we affirm the conviction and sentence.
Factual and Procedural Background
¶ 2 We view the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the jury’s verdict. See State v. Haight-Gyuro, 218 Ariz. 356,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kent K. v. Bobby M.Arizona Supreme Court · 2005
- Mail Boxes v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. EstradaArizona Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. Haight-GyuroCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- State Board of Barber Examiners v. WalkerArizona Supreme Court · 1948
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State of Arizona v. Javier SolisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- State of Arizona v. Usef Latrice Simmons IICourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015