Damm v. Gow
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Muskegon. (Dickerman, J.) Garnishment. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, C. J.
This is a suit against garnishees. Upon the trial in the court below it became material to introduce in evidence the judgment obtained against the defendant in the original suit, which was rendered before a justice of the peace, and plaintiff offered the docket of the justice to prove such judgment, which docket is in the form and reads as follows:
“Nels Damm, Plaintiff, vs. Isaac Lambert, Defendant.
Assumpsit.
“In justice court before Frank H. Bassett, justice of the peace.
1890. Aug. 30. Summons issued returnable at my office in the city of Muskegon on the 8th day of September, 1890, at one…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mudge v. YaplesMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- Loomis v. ArmstrongMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- King v. BatesMichigan Supreme Court · 1890