Legal Opinion
United States v. Gordon
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 17, 2004No. 03-50383, 03-50388PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
In these consolidated appeals, Jonathan Gordon and Stephen Gordon1 challenge their respective convictions and sentences for wire fraud involving deprivation of honest services, bank fraud, and false statements to a financial institution in connection with a check-kiting scheme. Stephen also appeals his conviction and sentence for conspiracy.
Jonathan argues that there was insufficient evidence to support his convictions. We review de novo the district court’s denial of his motion for judgment of acquittal under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 29(a). United States v. Naghani, 361…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. Alfred Arnold AmelineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Richard Joseph FinleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Gregorio De Jesus Mares, United States of America v. Alfredo Martinez-OsunaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Thomas J. WinkleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. WinkleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007