Legal Opinion

State v. Sang

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1935No. 25829. Department OnePublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

A grand jury in Pierce county, while engaged in investigating charges of graft and payment of protection money to public officers, examined Charles Sang, under oath, as a witness. Thereafter, January 28, 1935, the grand jury, by indictment, accused him of the crime of perjury in the first degree, in that, before the grand jury, he testified in substance and in fact as follows:

“That I never saw or talked with Holmes Eastwood before; that I never worked back of the cage; that I never sold lottery tickets at the Nanking, located at 1338% Broadway, in the months of June or July of 1934, or at any…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. DevlinWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Fish v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1914
  3. State v. TweedyWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  4. State v. CarrWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Luterman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. IngelsWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  2. State v. StevickWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  3. State v. LindseyWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  4. State v. GuerzonWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  5. State v. McVeighWashington Supreme Court · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API