Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Anderson

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 10, 1982No. 682PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

The principal issue in this.appeal is whether Pa.R.Crim.P. 1410 requires the Commonwealth, as well as a defendant, to file a motion to modify sentence with the sentencing court before obtaining appellate review of a sentence. We hold that the rule does have application to the Commonwealth and that a failure to comply therewith constitutes a waiver of the right to appellate review of the sentence. For this reason, we do not consider substantively the Commonwealth’s contention that the sentence imposed in this case disregarded an applicable guideline without cause and was too…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Bozza v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Commonwealth v. RigginsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Commonwealth v. KozielSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. QuinlanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Commonwealth v. IsabellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Commonwealth v. RoyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Commonwealth v. DrumgooleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Commonwealth v. GreerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API