Legal Opinion

Townsend v. . the Masterson, C., Stone Dressing Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 5, 1857PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The suggestion made on the argument by the plaintiff's counsel, that the stipulation had relation only to the appeal on his part, seems not to be well founded. When the stipulation was signed, neither party had served any notice of appeal to the general term. Both parties had, however, taken exceptions to decisions of the referee, and it is clear from the stipulation in regard to time for making a case, and from the terms of the other stipulation upon which the motion is founded, that both parties contemplated appealing to the general term. That stipulation was mutual, therefore, in its terms…

2Cited by18 opinions

  1. Riggs v. Commercial Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. People v. . StephensNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  3. Hoste v. DaltonMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  4. People v. VenturaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  5. United States Consol. Seeded Raisin Co. v. Chaddock & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1909

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API