Legal Opinion

Hollywood Foreign Press Ass'n v. Red Zone Capital Partners II

District Court, C.D. California

Decided April 30, 2012No. Case No. CV 10-8833 AHM (FMOx)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COURT’S FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

A. HOWARD MATZ, Senior District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Resolution of the dispute that is at the core of this case should not have required a trial. It is a contract dispute over who has the right to license the Golden Globes Award Show for television broadcast. The parties could have settled their differences even before the complaint was filed. Certainly by the autumn of 2011, after discovery had been completed and the main legal issues fully briefed, they were in a position to promote and protect their respective interests by entering into a…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Winet v. PriceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. Wolf v. Walt Disney Pictures and TelevisionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. City of Hope National Medical Center v. Genentech, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2008

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Best v. Harris Moran Seed Co.District Court, S.D. California · 2014
  2. Cooley v. Menzies Aviation (USA) Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API