Legal Opinion

Wilder v. Macfarlane

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1906PublishedCited by 1 opinion

EXCEPTIONS FROM ClRCuiT COURT, ElRST OIRCUIT.

1Opinion of the Court

*122OPINION OF THE COURT BY

HARTWELL, J.

The plaintiff brought ejectment for a strip of land at Waikiki 98 feet long, 11 feet wide at the mauka end and 2.4 feet wide at the m'akai end, containing 603 square feet, lying along the easterly side of L. 0. Award 922 to Okuu, purchased September 23, 1899, by the plaintiff from Ninia and others, devisees under the will of Okuu. This title was shown at the trial. The defendants hold as tenants under Mrs. F. W. Macfarlane who claims that she and her predecessor in interest, her father H. A. Widemann, held adverse possession of the premises for over ten…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Illinois Steel Co. v. BudziszWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Schraeder Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. PackerSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Ryan v. SchwartzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Lee v. KingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McCandless v. Honolulu Plantation Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API