First National Bank v. Consolidated School District No. 28
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion
Reargument was granted, and counsel for each side have presented additional oral arguments and briefs.
We refer to the school district as defendant.
4. It is argued that G. S. 1923 (2 Mason, 1927) § 9166, permits set-off of claims against intermediate holders only where such claims arose and matured after the one claiming such set-off had notice or knowledge of the intermediate holder's ownership of the obligation sued upon and before he had notice or knowledge of its subsequent assignment. We do not so construe the statute. The claim against the intermediate holder must have accrued before the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- St. Paul & M. Trust Co. v. LeckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Wunderlich v. Merchants National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- St. Paul & Sioux City Railroad v. GardnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
- La Due v. First National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Solway State Bank v. School District No. 26Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.