Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Henderson v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 28, 1957No. 36631Published

1ConcurrenceQuillian, J.

I concur in the result of the majority opinion. From the holding in Piedmont Hotel Co. v. Henderson, 9 Ga. App. 672 (6) (72 S. E. 51), a case of the nature we now consider, the arrest and detention are parts of a single legal transaction, elements of one offense. If the defendant arrested the person of another illegally, he could not then legally detain or imprison him. If he arrested such person legally, illegally detaining him would have the effect of converting the legal arrest into an illegal arrest.

The defendant’s animus or good faith in both making the arrest and detaining the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Piedmont Hotel Co. v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  2. Ocean Steamship Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  3. Moses v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  4. Harris v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
  5. King v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API