Legal Opinion

State v. Griffin

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 15, 2000No. COA99-140PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HORTON, Judge.

I

Defendant first assigns error to the trial court’s grant of the State’s motion to change the venue of this case from Union County. The State’s motion was based on the physical limitations of the Union County facilities and the desire to begin the trial on 12 January 1998, the trial date set by the trial court. Defendant contends that the defendant had a right to be tried “in the place of the crime” and the citizens of Union County had a right “to see justice done in their own community.” State v. Chandler, 324 N.C. 172, 184, 376 S.E.2d 728, 736 (1989). Our Supreme Court pointed…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. State v. BarfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. State v. BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  5. State v. StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. BroyhillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  2. State v. AlonzoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  3. State v. HughesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
  4. State v. RollinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  5. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API