Legal Opinion

Meikle v. Northwestern National Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 5, 1914No. Appeal, No. 263PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal, No. 263, Oct. T., 1913, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Allegheny Co., July T., 1910, No. 957, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Charles A. Meikle v. Northwestern National Insurance Company. . Assumpsit on insurance policy. Shafer, J., filed the following opinion: The action is upon a policy of fire insurance upon personal property.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 263, Oct. T., 1913, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Allegheny Co., July T., 1910, No. 957, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Charles A. Meikle v. Northwestern National Insurance Company. . Assumpsit on insurance policy. Shafer, J., filed the following opinion: The action is upon a policy of fire insurance upon personal property. The question tried by the jury was as to the value of the plaintiff’s goods and the jury rendered a verdict for the plaintiff for a sum less than his claim. As we understand it, however, the defendant does not press its motion for a new trial. The…

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cueiam,

The judgment in this case is affirmed on the opinion of the court below, denying judgment for the defendant non obstante veredicto.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Feather v. HusteadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  2. Snyder v. Bassler Limestone Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  3. First National Bank v. United Russian Orthodox Brotherhood of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API