Legal Opinion

Wartman v. Pecka

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1902No. Civil No. 764PublishedCited by 10 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the Third Judicial District in and for the County of Maricopa. Webster Street, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.

The appellant filed an action in the district court of Maricopa County against J. E. Williams and Charles *10H. Pierce to recover upon a promissory note. On the same day an attachment was sued out and levied on real estate of the defendant Pierce, situate in the city of' Phcenix. The defendant Pierce, who was a resident of the state of Georgia, died before the service by publication of summons was completed. The defendant Williams, after service of summons upon him, did not appear, but suffered judgment by default to be taken against him. The death of Pierce having been suggested to the court,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Myers v. MottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State of Arizona v. GreenhawArizona Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Citizens State Bank v. McRobertsArizona Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Guarantee Title & Trust Co. v. Babbitt Bros. Trading Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1936
  4. O'Malley Lumber Co. v. MartinArizona Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Lount v. HolladayArizona Supreme Court · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API