Legal Opinion
Tyson v. the Florida Bar
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided September 5, 2002No. SC01-2179PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
826 So.2d 265 (2002)
Charles Terry TYSON, Petitioner,
v.
THE FLORIDA BAR, Respondent.
No. SC01-2179.
Supreme Court of Florida.
September 5, 2002.
Charles T. Tyson, pro se, Sanderson, FL, for Petitioner.
No Appearance, for Respondent.
2Per curiam
Petitioner Charles Terry Tyson petitions this Court for a writ of mandamus commanding The Florida Bar to reopen its investigation into alleged prosecutorial misconduct by an assistant state attorney for the Fourth Judicial Circuit of Florida. Because petitioner cannot demonstrate that the Bar has failed to perform some duty which he has a clear legal right to have…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. CottonSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- Huffman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- Migliore v. City of LauderhillDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Application of HarperSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
- Migliore v. City of LauderhillSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by6 opinions
- In re Gregory J. BombardierSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
- & SC13-389 & SC13-390 The Florida Bar v. Charles Jay Kane, The Florida Bar v. Harley Nathan Kane & The Florida Bar v. Darin James LentnerSupreme Court of Florida · 2016
- Lawson v. IvashukDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- Michael Lorusso v. State of Florida Michael Lorusso v. Melton Harry Little Michael Lorusso v. Margaret A. Beck & Michael Lorusso v. Jake PillsburySupreme Court of Florida · 2022
- Walter E. Williams v. The Florida BarDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.