Manning v. City of Columbia
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Per curiam
Appellant (Defendant below) appeals from an order granting Respondents’ motion to amend a summons. We affirm.
Because we agree with the holding of the trial judge, we adopt his order as the directive of this court. It is as follows:
ORDER
This áction was commenced by summons and verified complaint dated October 6,1982. A notice of special appearance was made by the Defendant on October 18, 1982, for the purpose of contesting the jurisdiction of the court, on the ground that the summons attached to the complaint was defective. The summons provided that the Defendant was required to answer the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Krueger v. LynchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
- Lockway v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
- Calmes v. . LambertSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
- Lee v. . HoffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Lee v. HoffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.