Legal Opinion
United Saw, File & Steel Products Workers v. H. K. Porter Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 4, 1960No. Civ. A. 27077PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LORD, District Judge.
Plaintiff Union seeks to compel the defendant Company to proceed to arbitration under a collective bargaining agreement. The plaintiff Union is the United Saw, File and Steel Products Workers of America, Federal Labor Union No. 22254, AFL-CIO, an unincorporated association located in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, by Joseph Adair, President and trustee ad litem. The defendant Company is H. K. Porter Company, Disgton Division, a corporation organized and chartered under the laws of the state of Delaware, having an office and doing business at its Tacony plant in Philadelphia.
T…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- H. K. Porter Company, Inc. v. United Saw, File and Steel Products Workers of America, Federal Labor Union No. 22254, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
- International Telephone And Telegraph Corporation v. Local 400Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
- International Telephone & Telegraph Corp. v. Local 400, Professional, Technical & Salaried DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
- H. K. Porter Co. v. United Saw, File & Steel Products Workers of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1963
- H. K. Porter Company, Inc. v. United Saw, File and Steel Products Workers of America Federal Labor Union No.22254, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.