Legal Opinion

Crosby v. St. Paul City Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 12, 1886PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Bam-sey county, Brill, J., presiding, granting a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtVanderburgh, J.

This action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been suffered by plaintiff through the negligence of defendant in the management of one of its -cars *414upon which plaintiff was a passenger, and while she was in the act of alighting therefrom. The issues were tried before a jury, and submitted to them upon the testimony introduced in behalf of the respective parties. A new trial was granted by the court, on the ground that the verdict was not justified by the evidence.

It is not important to review the testimony in detail. It is sufficient to say that we have…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wood v. CullenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1868
  2. Pratt v. Pioneer Press Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
  3. Rheiner v. Stillwater Street Railway & Transfer Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
  4. Wilcox v. LandbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
  5. Clapp v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1884

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cable v. William ByrneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  2. Congdon v. BaileySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API