Smith v. Mendonsa
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.
On May 1, 1947, plaintiff and respondent, as promisee, entered into an agreement with defendants and appellants, as promisors, concerning the use of certain real property which had been conveyed by respondent to appellants. Therein they agreed that in the use of their property they would permit no trees to remain thereon which exceeded a height of 15 feet; that should any tree attain a greater height respondent would have the right to remove the same. It was stated that the purpose of the agreement was to prevent the improper shading of respondent’s contiguous land and to prevent trees on the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Teller v. Bay and River Dredging Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Morris v. GeorgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
3Cited by10 opinions
- California Lettuce Growers, Inc. v. Union Sugar Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
- Wright v. RogersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Jacobsen v. PolandNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
- Mallon v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Essock v. MawhinneyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.