Dodd v. Croskey
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, C.J.
{¶ 1} In this appeal, we address important aspects of Ohio’s Dormant Mineral Act and its effect on the interaction between the rights of the owner of the surface lands and the rights of the holder of an interest in the minerals beneath the surface. Specifically, we resolve the question whether a mineral-interest holder’s claim to preserve a mineral interest from being deemed abandoned in accordance with R.C. 5301.56(H)(1)(a) is sufficient to preserve that interest if the claim was filed after notice of the surface owner’s intent to declare the mineral interest abandoned and outside the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Boley v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2010
- Henry v. Central National BankOhio Supreme Court · 1968
- Armstrong v. John R. Jurgensen Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2013
- Dodd v. CroskeyOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
3Cited by40 opinions
- Corban v. Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C., Et Al.Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- Buddenberg v. Weisdack (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- Walker v. Shondrick-Nau (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- West v. Bode (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- Sharp v. MillerOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.