State v. Taylor
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROTH, Judge:
¶ 1 Roy D. Taylor challenges the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence of drugs discovered during a consent search of his car. The court admitted the evidence, and a jury convicted Taylor of possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute and possession of drug paraphernalia. We affirm.
¶ 2 In October 2014, Officer Paul Scott saw Taylor traveling toward Heber City. Taylor and his car matched the description given to police by a confidential informant who indicated Taylor would be transporting methamphetamine. Scott then followed behind Taylor…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ohio v. RobinetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. McLeod.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2018
- Taylor v. State of UtahDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2020