Claim of Sarlo v. Antona Trucking Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed December 1, 1981, which found the State Insurance Fund to be the carrier on the risk on the date of claimant’s accident because its prior cancellation of the employer’s insurance policy did not comply with the requirements of subdivision 5 of section 54 of the Workers’ Compensation Law. The board found that appellant State Insurance Fund did not properly cancel the employer’s insurance policy. We agree. Proper cancellation of the policy in question requires, inter alia, that a notice of cancellation be “served' on the employer…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Nassau Insurance v. MurrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Claim of Fromer v. John Street Service Center, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
3Cited by7 opinions
- Claim of Bitterman v. Friscos Restaurant, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Claim of Caldas v. 86 Alda Restaurant, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- In re the Claim of FeinermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Claim of Adebahr v. 3840 Orloff Avenue Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Matter of Mendez v. TGA Constr., LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.