Legal Opinion

State v. J.M.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 17, 2005PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wallace

The primary issue in this appeal is whether a juvenile may present evidence during the probable cause portion of a juvenile waiver hearing. N.J.S.A. 2A:4A-26. The trial court denied the juvenile’s request to testify at the probable cause hearing. The Appellate Division reversed. Although we agree with the panel’s conclusion that the juvenile may present evidence at the probable *406cause hearing, we ground our decision not on the constitutional basis found by the panel, but in our authority to control the procedures of our courts. We hereby modify Rule 5:22-2 to expressly permit a juvenile to…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Winberry v. SalisburySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  4. Rodriguez v. ROSENBLATTSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
  5. State v. SmithSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. In Re Pl 2001, Chapter 362Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
  2. Toll Bros. v. Township of West WindsorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
  3. State of New Jersey v. Cecilio DavilaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2016
  4. State ex rel A.D.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2012
  5. State in the Interest of N.H.(076316)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2016

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API