Legal Opinion
Mendoza v. Helicopter
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided December 2, 2013No. 12-11053PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM: *
Amado Mendoza appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment for the *128defendant Bell Helicopter. For the reasons stated below, we affirm.
BACKGROUND
We are writing exclusively for the parties who are aware of the evidence in this case. Therefore an exhaustive factual summary is unnecessary. In short, Amado Mendoza (“Mendoza”), a United States citizen of Hispanic descent, began working as a tool and die maker at Bell Helicopter (“Bell”) in 2005. He alleged that starting in 2005 he endured race-based comments. He also asserts that he was subjected to other mistreatment…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Shirley A. Ramsey v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Delbert Johnson v. City of Fort WorthCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
- Brooks v. Firestone Polymers, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2014
- Martin v. Am. Midstream Partners, LPDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2019
- Satterwhite v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
- Brown v. Liberty Mutual Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.