State v. . Hall
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal by defendant from Daniels, J., at January Term, 1921, of ClTMBERLAND.
1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.
The defendant was convicted of a secret assault, and from the judgment upon such conviction he appealed to this Court, and assigns several errors.
1. That his contentions were not stated, though the State’s were given in full. This exception is not supported by the record, which shows that the contentions of both sides were stated by his Honor with fairness and impartiality. Besides, the objection, or rather suggestion, came too late. We have often held that such an objection must be made in apt time so that the court may have opportunity to supply any omission. The proceedings of the court…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. FullerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
- Osborne v. . WilkesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
- State v. . KinsaulsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
- State v. . SmallwoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
- State v. . BestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. . SteeleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- State v. SteeleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- State v. HollingsworthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- State v. . JessupSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Green v. W. M. Ritter Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.