Legal Opinion
State v. Askham
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided March 30, 2004No. 21413-3-IIIPublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
86 P.3d 1224 (2004)
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Leonard Ralph ASKHAM, Appellant.
No. 21413-3-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Four.
March 30, 2004.
Scott C. Broyles, Attorney at Law, Clarkeston, WA, for Appellant.
Ann C. Shannon, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, Colfax, WA, for Respondent.
OPINION PUBLISHED IN PART
SWEENEY, J.
A search warrant must be sufficiently particular to prevent a general exploratory search. This is frequently achieved by specifying the suspected crime. State v. Riley, 121 Wash.2d 22, 28, 846 P.2d 1365 (1993). The search warrant here authorized the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State v. GreenWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. DelmarterWashington Supreme Court · 1980
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. KintzWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. KintzWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. MillerUtah Supreme Court · 2023
- State v. ChangCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- State v. ChangCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.